Regretfully, Armenia is once again seeking to mislead the public opinion about the real situation, Aykhan Hajizada, Spokesperson of the Foreign Ministry of Azerbaijan, said while commenting the views of the Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan regarding the “peace agreement” and communications, Report informs, citing the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry.
“Armenia sent her remarks on the commentary submitted by Azerbaijan in June over the text of the draft bilateral Agreement on Peace and the Establishment of Interstate Relations between Azerbaijan and Armenia at the end of August, about 70 days later.
“Instead of adequately reacting to the commentary made by Azerbaijan, Armenia tried to turn a blind eye to the challenges by removing the necessary provisions that are necessary to be reflected in the draft. Even though 80% of the provisions have been agreed upon so far, not all of the draft’s provisions have been able to be agreed upon. However, this does not mean that an agreement should be signed by removing the non-agreed provisions from the draft, as Armenia suggested. This cannot be considered acceptable. For the peace agreement to be sustainable and successful, problematic issues between the two countries in a number of directions must be clarified in the draft.
While continuing its territorial claims against Azerbaijan and trying to restore the work of the Minsk Group, a remnant of the past conflict, Armenia’s call for the ‘peace agreement’ to be signed in any form by reducing the scope of the text raises many questions about this country’s true intentions.
To sign a draft agreement, first of all, Armenia has to make appropriate amendments to its Constitution, which currently refers to its territorial claims against our country.